Skip Navigation

Europace 2008 10(4):471-476; doi:10.1093/europace/eun061
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ammirati, F.
Right arrow Articles by Santini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ammirati, F.
Right arrow Articles by Santini, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


SYNCOPE: THE ROLE OF SYNCOPE UNIT

Management of syncope: clinical and economic impact of a Syncope Unit

Fabrizio Ammirati1,*, Roberto Colaceci1, Antonio Cesario1, Stefano Strano2, Alberto Della Scala3, Irene Colangelo3, Tiziana De Santo3, Elena Toscano3, Renato Ricci4 and Massimo Santini4

1 Department of Cardiology, G.B. Grassi Hospital, Via Passeroni 28, Ostia Lido, Roma, Italy; 2 Center for the Study of Syncope, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy; 3 Medtronic Italia SpA, Sesto S. Giovanni, MI, Italy; 4 Department of Cardiology, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Roma, Italy

Aims: Aim of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a Syncope Unit, in order to assess whether the implemented organization really improves syncope management.

Methods and results: The study enrolled patients with unexplained syncope who were consecutively referred to our Syncope Unit, either as outpatients or during hospitalization, in a 2-month period. The design of this observational study consists in three phases: a retrospective analysis of their clinical management in the 9 months prior to the first attendance at the Syncope Unit (phase one), their subsequent clinical management in the Syncope Unit (phase two) and a 9-month follow-up (phase three). The retrospective analysis of phase one showed that 25% of patients had already been hospitalized without diagnosis. After Syncope Unit evaluation, diagnosis was obtained in 82% of patients, with 15% of patients indicated to pacing. In the follow-up, 23% of patients experienced a syncopal recurrence. Our analysis indicated an 85% reduction of hospital costs in the follow-up period.

Conclusion: The clinical and economic analysis of the three phases of our study demonstrates that a Syncope Unit allows an improved management of patients with syncope.

Key Words: Syncope Unit, Guidelines, Loss of consciousness, OESIL risk score, Pacemaker


* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 06 354024444; fax: +39 06 56482177. E-mail address: fabammirati{at}alice.it

Manuscript submitted 12 September 2007. Accepted after revision 13 February 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.