Skip Navigation


Europace Advance Access originally published online on May 1, 2008
Europace 2008 10(6):726-728; doi:10.1093/europace/eun113
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/6/726    most recent
eun113v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Green, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Green, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ICDs

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in fractured Sprint Fidelis leads associated with ‘appropriate’ interrogation

David Farwell*, Calum Redpath, David Birnie, Michael Gollob, Robert Lemery, Emoke Posan and Martin Green

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada

We present two patients with fractures within the pace–sense circuit of their Medtronic Sprint Fidelis leads who received inappropriate shocks from their Medtronic defibrillators during device interrogation. This was not simply a coincidence, but due to electromagnetic interference induced within the Sprint Fidelis lead by the device programmer during two-way communication with the defibrillator. Our subsequent investigations have uncovered at least two other similar incidents in Canada. We have also discovered that the Medtronic ‘Auto-resume’ feature may leave future patients uniquely vulnerable to such inappropriate shocks in the future.

Key Words: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead, Inappropriate shocks, Electromagnetic interference

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 6138824670.E-mail address: djfarwell{at}bigfoot.com

Manuscript submitted 27 March 2008. Accepted after revision 31 March 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.